February 5th 2012 04:59 pm
The termite conspiracy – Part 2
It appears that there some people who still do not understand what is being said by the authors of the paper. The authors assert that a thermitic material was used in the controlled demolition of the towers. In support of this claim they rely on, what they say is, unreacted thermite material found in the debris. They offer no explanation as to how or why “un-reacted” thermite material would be in the rubble. Nor do they make any assessment of the quantity of thermite material used in the demolition. As I hope is clear from this video, given the proportions in the one sample that they did weigh, the amount of un-reacted thermite is massive. Assuming that a proportion of the thermite material did ignite/explode then the total amount of thermite material in the towers prior to their collapse increases yet again – by what factor? The authors also fail to explain how the thermite was used. Their argument is simply this – we found thermite; it should not have been there – you explain it. Obviously I do not accept that the material they found was un-reacted thermite. Reference 1 “The thermite conspiracy” www.youtube.com Reference 2 The Paper can be downloaded from here; www.bentham.org (1st) Reference 3 Patent for thermite charge www.freepatentsonline.com (2nd) Reference 3 The Rev Ernest Poe www.youtube.com Reference 5 Defusing Nanothermite: Integrity www.youtube.com Reference 6 JREF forum; 11-settembre.blogspot.com Thank you to everyone who mirrored or tried to mirror the last …
Mail this post
Tags: 911, aronra, conspiracy, deroylight, Gourley, jref, termite, thermate, thermite, thunderf00t, towers, twin
No Comments yet »
